|
With
Gigabit Ethernet however, all four pairs can be used to transmit
simultaneously, and so the cross talk on each pair has to be
measured for the combined effects of the other three pairs.
Cat 6
At last! the standard for Cat 6 has been approved for publication
by the EIA (TIA/EIA-568-B.2-1). Category 6 is capable of transmission
frequencies up to 250Mhz and has a positive power sum attenuation
to crosstalk ratio upto 200MHz using improved cables and RJ45
connectors. The problem that manufacturers have, is that to
meet the Cat 6 specification, requires the use of cables and
connectors which are designed to work together as a 'tuned'
system. This means that if you install a Cat 6 system the manufacturer
will only guarantee performance if all of the components including
the patch leads are from their Cat 6 product range. In fact,
by mixing Cat 6 components from different manufacturers you
could end up with a system with worse performance characteristics
than a conventional Cat 5e system. That said, it is worth noting
that Cat 6 systems are backwards compatible with Cat 5/5e cabling
and when mixed with these lower bandwidth systems the performance
criteria of the lower specification will still be met.
Testing
Cat 6 cables can be a frustrating process, apart from taking
longer because the tester has to scan frequency steps up to
200MHz instead of 100MHz, the fine line between pass and fail
is accentuated it seems by the slightest kink and twist. The
most significant factor when testing a Cat 6 system can be return
loss failures due to the test leads themselves. All connectors
have a life cycle and with the average RJ45 connector this is
around one or two thousand insertions, so test leads should
be replaced after every 1000 tests or so. OK, not a problem
but at around $200 per set this cost will have to be considered
when pricing jobs.
Fluke
seem to have a solution to this problem with their DSP-LIA101S
Permanent Link Adapters. The connector at the end of the leads
are interchangeable and replaceable with connectors from different
manufacturers to ensure compatibility with the system under
test. Although a good idea, the adapters are over $500 and a
new pair of "Personality Modules" cost over $100.
Surely the test plugs should now be considered as 'consumables'
and the price lowered to reflect this.
Cat
7
This is proposed to be a 600MHz system using a shielded cable
with individually screened pairs and a new type of connector.
The cable and connectors are slightly bigger than Cat 5e and
installation time can be increased because of the complexity
of the termination. There are two main draw backs with installing
this type of cabling, the first is the additional cost involved,
and the second is that almost all networking hardware uses RJ45
jacks. To connect to the cabling system, you have to use Cat
7 to Cat 5e patch leads, and because any system is only as good
as its weakest link, your speed is back down to 100MHz. Ratification
of the Cat 7 standard could be two years away by which time
fibre might be a cheaper alternative.
Shielded
or Unshielded
This is a subject that has been debated and argued over for
a long time, and as yet, there are still no definite answers.
Most countries in Europe, and in particular Germany, argue that
apart from protecting data signals against high frequency noise
from outside sources, shielded cable also protects the humans
against the possibility of having their brains fried due to
the effects of high frequency emissions from the cable itself.
Other countries, such as the UK, US and Canada, aren't particularly
bothered by this because nothing has been proved, and after
all, millions of people wander around with mobile phones pressed
against the side of their heads with no apparent side effects,
er... yet. My advice would be to install unshielded cable unless
the customer insists on a shielded system.
|